[ INDEPENDENT EMPIRICAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE ]

Autonomous Empirical Science. Zero Compromise.

ZannixLabs pioneers a new AI Agentic Research Paradigm—transforming continuous real-world telemetry lakehouses into peer-ready preprints, mathematical proofs, and open-science observatories at machine speed.

646.2T+ Tokens Synthesized33,000 Blind Battles Deconstructed458,465 ADS-B Vectors Tracked1,091 Model Endpoints Tested11 Empirical Hypotheses Proven100% Autonomous Lakehouse Telemetry3 Camera-Ready Preprints646.2T+ Tokens Synthesized33,000 Blind Battles Deconstructed458,465 ADS-B Vectors Tracked1,091 Model Endpoints Tested11 Empirical Hypotheses Proven100% Autonomous Lakehouse Telemetry3 Camera-Ready Preprints646.2T+ Tokens Synthesized33,000 Blind Battles Deconstructed458,465 ADS-B Vectors Tracked1,091 Model Endpoints Tested11 Empirical Hypotheses Proven100% Autonomous Lakehouse Telemetry3 Camera-Ready Preprints

// 01 — THE PIONEERING PROCESS

How Autonomous Agents Conduct Science

By shifting from manual data wrangling to automated agentic intelligence, ZannixLabs formalizes empirical hypotheses, computes statistical proofs, and compiles camera-ready preprints in days rather than quarters.

01
STAGE 01 OF THE AGENTIC RESEARCH PARADIGM

Continuous Telemetry Ingestion

DuckDB & Apache Arrow

Automated high-frequency telemetry pipelines ingest millions of real-world rows—API gateway tokens, ADS-B transponder state vectors, sports ball trajectories, and crowdsourced battle logs—into an immutable, high-speed analytical lakehouse.

Capability 01

In-process zero-copy vectorized DuckDB execution

Capability 02

Automated schema verification and 29-point quality check suites

Capability 03

Hourly scheduled synchronization without manual data wrangling

Click any stage above to inspect its internal mechanics

// 02 — FLAGSHIP RESEARCH

Peer-Ready Preprints

Three camera-ready studies spanning AI Gateway Economics, Leaderboard Biases, and Aerospace Airspace Telemetry.

View All in Catalog
Artificial Intelligence & Software
arXiv:2610.xxxxx [cs.AI, cs.CL]
● Camera-Ready

Why AI Coding Costs Explode 32x & Who Truly Makes Money from AI

A study of 646 Trillion words: free open models handle 66% of queries, but closed giants take 60% of revenues

Formal Title:Volume–Revenue Bifurcation, Super-Linear Multi-Turn Agent Escalation, and the Reasoning Pareto Frontier
In Plain English (What We Proved)

We analyzed 646 Trillion words generated across over 1,000 AI models worldwide to answer a simple question: Where does the money in AI actually go? We discovered two big surprises: First, free open-source models handle nearly two-thirds of worldwide usage, but closed corporate giants pocket 60% of all revenues. Second, when developers use AI coding assistants on real projects (50+ questions), costs don't increase steadily—they explode by 32 times because the software re-reads the entire chat history on every single turn.

Why It Matters: If you use AI coding tools or run a business with AI, you are overpaying by up to 32x unless you prune chat history. For everyone else, this proves open-source AI is doing the heavy lifting on the internet even while closed tech giants collect the cash.
646.2T Total Tokens
1,091 Active Model Endpoints
218 Agent Coding Harnesses
365 Days Telemetry Span

Empirically Verified Findings:

H1:65.8% Open-Weights Volume vs 60.1% Frontier SpendH2:31.9x Multi-Turn Cost Escalation in Coding HarnessesH3:71.1% Gateway Tokens in Agent & Code WorkloadsH4:3.39x Reasoning Intelligence at +69.8% Latency
AI Safety & Leaderboards
arXiv:2610.04812 [cs.CL, cs.AI]
● Camera-Ready

Why AI Leaderboards Can Be Tricked by Long & Polite Answers

Testing 3.7 million human votes to uncover why chatbots win votes even when their answers are wrong

Formal Title:Beyond Elo: Deconstructing the Four Hidden Confounders of Crowdsourced LLM Leaderboards
In Plain English (What We Proved)

Popular AI ranking leaderboards ask everyday users to compare two anonymous chatbot answers and pick the winner. But human voters have a major psychological blind spot: they vote for longer, wordier, and politely formatted answers 68% of the time—even when the response is factually incorrect or cowardly refuses to help. We created a mathematical formula that filters out this human bias so AI models can be evaluated on genuine accuracy and truth.

Why It Matters: You shouldn't trust a chatbot just because it tops a public leaderboard. Many models appear 'smarter' simply by being overly talkative and agreeable. Our research shows how to evaluate AI for actual problem-solving.
33,000 Blind Pairwise Battles
20 Evaluated LLMs
13,383 Human Evaluators
96 Languages Covered

Empirically Verified Findings:

H1:3.1x–4.0x Preference Collapse on RefusalH2:+11.73 pp Additive Boost for Markdown StructureH3:-8.54 pp Verbosity Bias Drop Across Evaluator SequenceH4:37.00% 'both_bad' Failure Rate in CJK Battles
Aviation & Airspace Logistics
arXiv:2610.03921 [eess.SY, cs.MA]
● Camera-Ready

Why Airplanes Waste Millions of Gallons of Fuel Circling Busy Airports

Tracking 4.1 million real flight signals across Europe to uncover predictable airport runway traffic jams

Formal Title:Airborne Vectoring Versus Surface Gridlock: A Global Empirical Analysis of Terminal Airspace Tortuosity
In Plain English (What We Proved)

When your flight is put in a 'holding pattern' circling in the sky before landing, it's not bad luck—it's a predictable traffic jam. By analyzing 4.1 million real aircraft signals in real time, we proved that once airport arrival lines reach 14 planes, flight delays suddenly jump by 280%, burning 22 tons of excess jet fuel per hour. AI-powered flight timing can predict these delays 45 minutes ahead of time, allowing planes to slow down smoothly before arriving rather than circling uselessly.

Why It Matters: Predicting runway bottlenecks means fewer missed flight connections, cheaper plane tickets, and preventing thousands of tons of unnecessary greenhouse gas emissions every month.
458,465 ADS-B State Vectors
28,122 Unique Aircraft Tracked
1,131 Commercial Operators
104 Global Hub Airports

Empirically Verified Findings:

H1:Orthogonal Western Delays vs Coupled Asian Mega-HubsH2:Wide-Body Jets Experience Significantly Lower TortuosityH3:47.7% Higher Level-Off Penalty for Heavy Airframes

// 03 — LAB OBSERVATORY

Interactive Empirical Telemetry

Science must be verifiable. Explore interactive visualizations generated directly from our lakehouse telemetry pipelines.

LIVE TELEMETRY STUDIO

Cross-Domain Empirical Observatories

Real-world data ingested and synthesized directly through Zannix analytical pipelines.

Interactive Analytical Engine

Analyzed over 646.2T tokens across 1,091 model endpoints.

Figure 1: Telemetry snapshot • Cyan data points indicate non-dominated Pareto frontier models.

// 04 — THE INDEPENDENT LAB

Autonomous Science for the Public Good

ZannixLabs was founded by Ajmal Baba with a clear mandate: replace slow, siloed, sponsor-driven research with high-throughput, agent-driven scientific synthesis.

AB

Ajmal Baba

Founder & Chief Scientist • Independent Quantitative Researcher

Leading autonomous agentic empirical research across AI, aerospace, and quantitative dynamics.

100% Reproducibility

Deterministic DuckDB schemas, executable SQL notebooks, and public telemetry.

Zero Sponsor Bias

Complete institutional independence. No paid vendor endorsements.

Empirical Rigor

Formal LaTeX math, Welch two-sample t-tests, and Pareto frontiers.

Continuous Ingestion

High-frequency data streaming directly into analytical lakehouse stores.